Describe your initiative/project
In November of 2013, the Office of International Education (OIE) at the University of South Alabama (USA) identified existing barriers that inhibited study abroad participation at USA and proposed a strategy to increase the number of students on international programs.
Some of the identified barriers to greater study abroad participation include the following:
- Outdated application system
- Varying levels of knowledge about study abroad on-campus
- Preconceived notion that study abroad is only available to language majors
- Preconceived notion that study abroad is only available to wealthy students
- USA student population includes large number of first generation students, many of whom have never left Alabama and may not see study abroad as an option.
USA has a strong academic focus on the sciences; Nursing is the #1 major and there is a large medical program that attracts many students after completion of an undergraduate degree. On-campus, many believed that students in the sciences were unable to go abroad.
What need does this initiative/project intend to meet? What conversations/other projects led to its creation?
The current University President, Dr. Waldrop, was inaugurated in 2014 and announced five areas of focus for his presidency, one of which was “greater cultural understanding and global collaboration” achieved by “encouraging more students to study abroad”. Additionally, the University’s Strategic Plan implemented the Core Value of “Diversity and a Global Perspective”. Subsequently, the president has formed several campus-wide committees focused on articulating a cohesive message about how international education will be defined at University of South Alabama. This high-level support of study abroad has been influential in office efforts to increase participation and has led to many cross-campus meetings with offices such as Veteran’s Affairs, the Registrar, Multicultural Affairs, etc.
Which student group(s) did your institution target as part of your initiative/project?
As part of OIE’s initiative, we were targeting the entire student population, including first generation students, students of color, students of all disciplines (including STEM and medical students), etc.
Why did your institution feel that it was necessary to target this group?
USA has a large population of first generation students, students of high financial need, and students of color (African American 20.8%, American Indian 0.6%, Asian 3.4%, Hispanic 2.5%, Multiracial 2.1%, Nonresident Alien 4.2%, Pacific Islander 0.2%, Unknown 2.2%). Additionally, STEM majors make up four of the University’s five most popular majors (1. Nursing, 2. Business Administration, 3. Professional Health Sciences, 4. Biomedical Sciences, 5. Biology). OIE knew it would be important to target these populations, as part of the larger effort to increase participation across all student groups, because they represent such a prominent part of our community.
Activities support these efforts include the following:
- OIE began promoting the Gilman Scholarship, which included sending an OIE staff member to serve as a Gilman Scholarship Panelist in 2014. USA had 3 Gilman recipients for summer 2015.
- Airbus recently moved to Mobile, AL (Airbus headquarters is located in Germany). For STEM majors (engineering), USA leveraged this connection to develop an exchange agreement with a university in Hamburg, Germany.
- A faculty-led program for nursing majors is currently being developed. Last year, a member of the Nursing faculty accompanied one of the USA study abroad programs on a scouting trip.
OIE is working with the Veteran’s Affairs Office to understand what benefits are available for study abroad.
Tell us step by step the process taken to implement this initiative/project?
Action Steps:
- Revise website
- Implement Studio Abroad application and enrollment software by Terra Dotta
- Set up all student applications in Studio Abroad
- Work to implement a scholarship fund for international programs
- Create a one credit hour, pre-departure course for students who study abroad
- Create section numbers or detail codes for all departments that denote study abroad
- Develop a step-by-step guide for students and faculty on study abroad participation
- Work with the Financial Aid and Registrar’s offices to develop student friendly policies and procedures
- Create a study abroad brand and a marketing and recruitment strategy
- Develop an International Education Ambassador internship program
- Create presence on campus
- Hosted an OIE open house for students and one for faculty/staff to help the campus community learn where the office is located and what opportunities were available. This led to conversations with faculty/staff about how to encourage students from different majors to go abroad.
- Hosted three fairs and multiple events throughout the academic year. The Fall 2014 study abroad fair attracted roughly 500 students which represents a significant increase from previous years.
What obstacles were encountered throughout the planning and implementation phases?
Overcoming preconceived notions of what it means to study abroad and who is able to study abroad was our biggest obstacle. Many students at USA believed that only wealthy language majors were able to study abroad, so not only did OIE have to get the word out about our programs, we also had to rewire general beliefs about education abroad.
Which faculties, departments, centers and/or student groups on campus were involved in the process?
We created a team of 11 returned study abroad students to serve as International Education Ambassadors, which were one of our biggest assets. This group of ambassadors included several students of color who gave presentations to address issues/concerns for specific student groups, including the African-American Student Association, for example. This initiative was developed as a result of conversations between the OIE and the Multicultural Affairs Office.
Additionally, we met with a number of other departments on campus to collaborate, including the Registrar, Financial Aid, Admissions, Enrollment Services, Veteran’s Affairs, Multicultural Affairs, Disability Services, Student Government, Greek Life, Housing, Academic Affairs, Student Affairs, etc. We worked with a number of departments on campus to develop faculty-led programming, including Foreign Languages and Literatures, History, Sociology, Anthropology, and Visual Arts. We also worked with a number of departments to work towards future exchange partnerships, non-credit abroad experiences, and future faculty-led opportunities, including Nursing, Education, Occupational Therapy, Physician’s Assistants, Engineering, and more.
Were there any new assessments and/or procedures produced due to the initiative/project? Describe any new processes, policies, assessments, or other tools that may have been created or updated to reflect the office’s commitment to diversity and inclusion.
Describe any new processes, policies, assessments, or other tools that may have been created or updated to reflect the office’s commitment to diversity and inclusion. For example, some institutions have modified how they review process of third-party providers to include questions about whether or not the provider’s staff has had diversity training.
We partnered with Diversity Abroad and Generation Study Abroad. We also developed nine new exchange or direct enroll partnerships (twelve total) and seven new affiliate partnerships (fourteen total).
What were the results of your initiative?
Study abroad students:
- Academic Year 2012/13: 35 on traditional programs, 17 on medical programs, & 10 on research programs = 62 students total
- Academic Year 2013/14: 61 on traditional programs, 11 on medical programs, 1 on a research program, & 1 on an externship = 74 students total
- Academic Year 2014/15: 175 students total:
- *Fall 2014: 8 on semester programs, 20 on medical program, & 3 on research programs = 31 students
- *Spring 2015: 7 on traditional programs, 2 on research programs, & 1 attending a conference = 10 students
- *Summer 2015: 73 on faculty-led programs, 16 on other traditional programs, 9 on research programs, 3 attending conferences, & 33 on medical missions = 134 students
Percent increase from AY 2012/2013 to AY 2014/15: 182%
Percent increase from AY 2013/2014 to AY 2014/2015: 136%
A scholarship fund of $100,000 was created for the International Education Study Abroad scholarship which has allowed OIE to consider creative ways to support students both in recruitment and retention. The university administration was highly involved in establishing the scholarship fund. This scholarship fund has been instrumental, in part, because students at USA note funding as a major obstacle to study abroad. Tuition at USA is quite low which means that a semester abroad can represent a significant difference in cost. In addition to providing scholarship funds to students in need, OIE is also promoting faculty-led programs (as a USA class, financial aid applies) and exchanges (students pay on-campus tuition) as more affordable options for students.
Additional results include the following:
- We were also successful in promoting scholarships to students to receive outside funding, including three Benjamin A. Gilman recipients for the summer 2015 semester.
- All applications are now on Terra Dotta.
- We created the pre-departure course with approximately 40 students enrolled in the inaugural semester.
- We ran six faculty-led study abroad programs during the summer 2015.
- We ran three study abroad fairs during the year, along with numerous other events.
Increased general awareness of study abroad on campus.
What would you recommend to other institutions interested in implementing a similar initiative?
What specific strategies did you employ or would you recommend employing in support of successful implementation of this kind of initiative?
Work collaboratively across all departments to build something together.