gic26 north america menu call for proposals open
EventsBecome a Member
Sign In
da global logo

Advancing the Work of DEI in International Education Through Thought Leadership and Research

August 30, 2023

SUMMARY:

This thought piece emphasizes the importance of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in international education. It highlights the underrepresentation of scholars and organizations of color in thought leadership due to biases in academic recognition. The article advocates for recognizing and supporting practitioner-focused entities like Diversity Abroad. It suggests actively citing their work and encouraging academic institutions to value practitioner-focused research, ultimately aiming to enhance DEI in the field.

AUTHORS:

  • Jinous Kasravi, PhD| Diversity Abroad, Director of Membership & Community

The world we live in is complex, connected, and ever changing. The challenges and issues our field and our students contend with on a daily basis require inclusive solutions that recognize and honor the rich variety of experiences and perspectives that shape our global community. The importance of understanding and valuing diversity in all its forms has become increasingly urgent. For those working in the field of international education, this means that we must continue to advance our research and scholarship agenda. Despite the importance of including diverse perspectives in thought leadership in our field, organizations and scholars of color – who may already face barriers to recognition and advancement – may often not be one of the first avenues we turn to for thought leadership in the field.

An article by Inside Higher Education (2021) discusses the inequity in the field of higher education as it pertains to undercitation or incorrect citation by diverse scholars. One reason for this undercitation may be the tendency to prioritize prestige in academic publishing. Journals with high impact factors or institutions with well-known names may be more likely to receive citations, even if their work is not as relevant or practical as that of practitioner-focused organizations like Diversity Abroad. This is a problem not just for Diversity Abroad, but for the field of international education as a whole. By failing to recognize the important work being done by diverse scholar-practitioners, we risk perpetuating the inequities and biases that have long plagued our field.

So, what can we do to change this? One step is to actively seek out and cite the work of practitioner-focused organizations working to advance DEI in the field when conducting research or writing publications. Another step is to advocate for greater recognition and support for these organizations and scholar-practitioners in our field. This might mean encouraging academic institutions and journals to prioritize practitioner-focused work in their promotion to tenure practices, similar to what Griffin (2019) suggests to engagement of service being undervalued when faculty of color are considered.

Diversity Abroad is the leading organization dedicated to promoting diversity and inclusion in international education. We provide a space for scholar-practitioners in our field to get published in our editorial reviewed publication the Global Impact Exchange, submit articles on various topics for posting on our website, and contribute as an author in our other research and reports.

Ultimately, the work of promoting diversity and inclusion in international education requires all of us to be active and engaged participants. By contributing to and citing the work of organizations like Diversity Abroad and others focused on similar missions, we can help to advance the number of scholars of color in our field.

References

12 Women Scholars (2021, August 16). A Disturbing Pattern. Inside Higher Education. https://www.insidehighered.com/advice/2021/08/27/entrenched-inequity-not-appropriately-citing-scholarship-women-and-people-color.

Griffin,K.A. (2019, February 14). Redoubling Our Efforts: How Institutions Can Affect Faculty Diversity. American Council on Educationhttps://www.equityinhighered.org/resources/ideas-and-insights/redoubling-our-efforts-how-institutions-can-affect-faculty-diversity/

Embracing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Work in a Sustainable Way

AUTHORS:

  • Kelly Trail | Allegiant Global Partners
  • Ryan Lorenz | Academic Solutions
  • Seth Weil | CEA CAPA Education Abroad
  • Andrea Blue | Grand Valley State University

This article was contributed by the 2022-2023 Diversity Abroad Community of Practice for Strategy & Leadership.

Getting Buy-In

Many people are already sold on the importance of DEI work while others haven’t even entered the store– they don’t see the value, the importance, or the justification. Many people will embrace the moral justification for DEI efforts while others may not. However, achieving a level of buy-in from the collective whole is necessary. “Mandating” that people engage in activities that take them too far from their comfort zone can actually cause them to regress in their acceptance of DEI efforts. It’s important to meet them where they are at and guide them in expanding their understanding from there in order to be truly successful in implementing these initiatives.

A starting place to engage people in DEI efforts could include the following rationale:

  • We are here to serve students (similar to the values case justification for corporate DEI), so we have an obligation to understand them and their needs in order to best support them.
  • Incorporating universal design into teaching , although it includes an initial time investment, will result in less ongoing work from faculty as they will receive fewer questions from students and avoid confusion about course requirements, expectations, communication, and other core areas of classroom/course management.
  • DEI can contribute to the effectiveness and efficiency of your work. It does not have to be an additional “thing” that you do. It can be integrated into your work and ultimately provide you with more time to do the work about which you are most passionate. For example, if you have done work to make a faculty-led program more inclusive, you will spend less time dealing with issues that arise on-site.
  • A strategy to avoid potential ramifications of not engaging in significant DEI work that could include legal action against you or your organization (if you are engaging in behaviors that are not inclusive).
  • Creating an inclusive work environment leads to increased employee retention. This saves money, maintains morale, boosts productivity, and saves time.

Sustaining efforts as new employees join the team

Let’s say your organization has made great strides in its DEI work – your staff has been trained, you’ve implemented policies that are more inclusive, equitable, and support diversity; you have a strategy for fostering a more inclusive workplace; you are well-equipped to support all students, etc. Then, someone new joins your team. What mechanisms do you have in place to ensure this important DEI work doesn’t fizzle out as the champions retire or move on to new positions? It has to be sustained by bringing new team members into the fold from day one.
Here Are some strategies you could engage new employees in:

  • On day one, in your first discussions, talk about the importance of DEI work (don’t assume they already understand the justifications) and what their role will be in contributing to those efforts.
  • Ask them about their ideas for creating a more diverse, inclusive, and equitable environment. Their fresh lens may identify gaps or space for improvement. Including them in the process and ensuring they know their ideas are wanted and valued is key.
  • Get their buy-in (see above). Figure out what motivates them and how you can connect that to your organization’s DEI efforts.
  • Whether it is within your institution or external, connect them with training related to DEI.
  • Include DEI-related goals or questions in the employee performance review. This demonstrates the importance to your organization and establishes that DEI work is ongoing (not a “one and done” thing).This also allows the employee to connect DEI directly to their role and work.

Avoiding Burn-out

DEI work cannot be one person’s “add-on” responsibility. Yes, there should be a leader (or co-leaders to advance the work in a strategic way), but it must also be embedded into the work that everyone does. It should be everyone’s responsibility to foster a more inclusive environment. Here are some approaches to achieve that goal:

  • Provide regular updates on the DEI strategy to the entire team- what has been accomplished, what is coming up next, how they can get involved, etc.
  • Provide opportunities for engagement. For example, if there is a plan being developed, bring in colleagues to contribute or review who aren’t one of the designated leaders.
  • Clearly articulate what is the responsibility of each person. These people may not be on any DEI committee, but still have a role to play in the DEI strategy. For example:
    • Modify all website links to optimize them for screen readers – Tina, IT
    • Review scholarship criteria – Erin, Education Abroad – Mario, Financial Aid
    • Ensure advising team has completed the Inclusive Advising training – Daria, Education Abroad
    • Assess how students can access diversity-related resources for study abroad – Tony, Education Abroad
  • People feel less burnt out if they have a personal sense of satisfaction and joy from the work they are doing. Articulating the DEI successes can contribute to them feeling motivated to continue contributing to the organization’s DEI strategy, goals, and vision.

In conclusion, sustaining DEI efforts can be hard, but it does not have to be. Implementing some strategies to get widespread buy-in, embed the work in the roles of all team members, and avoiding burnout can set the stage for sustainable DEI advancements.

You may find the following Diversity Abroad Resources to be helpful:

Creating a Culture of Wellness in the International Education Workplace

By Tiffany Komon and  Stephanie Ramin | May 6, 2024

“Burnout”, “stress”, and “workplace anxiety”, are likely not new concepts to anyone reading this post. As co-authors and passionate international education professionals, our interest in this topic is deeply personal. In particular, Tiffany’s mental health journey began as a teenager when she was diagnosed with depression and anxiety. Now as an adult, she navigates mental health challenges in the workplace. Between losing sleep over the next day’s looming tasks, and overwhelming tears falling during staff meetings, career-related stress has often felt debilitating. For Stephanie, she has witnessed how the mental health of some of her colleagues over the years has been impacted through their roles in higher education and she wants to better understand what can be done to provide positive and effective change.

For those who face mental health challenges, it’s necssary to have support in the workplace. Recent data from McKinsey & Company found that while 65% of employers report that mental health is supported “well” or “very well”, only 51% of their employees agree. This means almost half of the surveyed employees do not feel their workplace adequately supports mental well-being. The international education space is not immune to this sentiment either.

How does the international education field compare?

The Forum on Education Abroad’s 2022 State of Field noted that organizational support and culture were listed as the top reasons for employees to leave or remain at their current workplace. The McKinsey survey also notes that maintaining a workplace that supports emotional and mental well-being is correlated with increased employee satisfaction and retention rates. With international education being faced with setbacks of the “Great Resignation”, it has become increasingly pertinent to address retention factors and support employees holistically. The 2022 Diversity Abroad Professional Survey also offers insights into international educators’ demographics and workplace satisfaction, revealing a critical need for more inclusive practices to enhance employee retention and engagement.

To better understand the current landscape of organizational support in our field, we surveyed 31 international education professionals. We found that over 64% of organizational leaders do not address personal wellness regularly according to respondents. In addition, almost 30% of respondents felt as if their supervisors were unsupportive, or not very supportive of their mental health. When asked what they wished their organization or supervisor knew about supporting them in their well-being, respondents noted a variety of things they wish their employers would do differently. Here is a brief summary of the most commonly mentioned points:

  • Provide more organizational support: Although many respondents noted that supervisors supported their well-being, some did note neutral or negative perceptions of their supervisor’s support and wished they would be more empathetic towards employees’ personal situations. Furthermore, even when respondents were able to note positive experiences of support from their direct supervisors, they indicated the support stopped there. Often, they mentioned a lack of support and understanding from upper administration.
  • Create clearer boundaries: Many noted how taxing work in the field of international education can be: it is the expectation in many offices to answer emails outside of standard working hours, even on breaks. It is also a reality for many to be on call 24/7 to handle student emergencies, which can be psychologically taxing. Many respondents identified burnout as an issue, and there is a desire for a better work-life balance and more realistic expectations for what truly needs to be worked on outside of standard working hours and what can wait until they’re officially back on the clock.
  • Offer more flexibility: In particular, having the flexibility to work remotely and flexibility to have personal days and/or mental health days in addition to standard sick leave were mentioned as desirable by various respondents. Additionally, some respondents noted that not having to explain the need for the time off (i.e. specific illnesses, therapy, etc.) would also be appreciated.
  • Provide more resources/awareness of resources: It was noted that it would be helpful to be provided with more resources to help address mental well-being. For example, some respondents mentioned that mental health care was still expensive under standard health insurance, or even non-existent, so having more accessible resources available to staff would be beneficial. Additionally, it was noted that employees should be better informed of benefits offered at their organization, and encouraged to use them (particularly those that are at no cost).
  • Increase compensation: Some respondents noted that they aren’t compensated well for their roles; in fact, the primary stress that one respondent felt they have from their job is the financial stress brought on by a lack of sufficient compensation for their work.
  • Increase staffing: Finally, many respondents noted turnover in their work environment, and that empty positions often sit vacant for extended periods of time (sometimes never being filled at all). In addition, it seems high demands then sometimes fall on current staff, who often have to take on the tasks of those that have left (and are still expected to meet the same office goals/outcomes with less support). Respondents wished organizations would be more proactive about filling open positions sooner.

What can office leaders do?

Mental well-being and the maintenance of one’s mental health are often viewed as an individual responsibility, rather than a collective one. Countless blogs and articles with self-care tips, stress management advice, and guides to practices such as meditative breathing are just a quick Google search away. While individuals should be expected to take responsibility for their overall health, given the demands and heavy nature of the international education field, it is unsurprising that our work can impact our well-being. Between handling 24/7 student crises to taking late-night meetings with partners across time zones, international educators are often making personal sacrifices for the sake of their jobs. There are only so many breathing exercises one can do before the issue of employee well-being becomes larger than the workers themselves. The tone for the workplace wellness culture is set by office leadership. Unit leaders have the power to establish and curate workplace norms. Actions such as sending late-night emails or planning weekend/evening events could insinuate that working outside of standard office hours is the expectation in that space, affecting work-life balance and ultimately employee well-being. Therefore, support from office leadership is key to curating the office’s well-being culture.

Support from office leadership can take a variety of forms:

  • First, office leaders can establish clear expectations and boundaries of working hours, and limit communication and work events outside of said hours.
  • Additionally, education and transparency about employer-sponsored wellness benefits are crucial. Employers should make employees aware of their options and encourage them to utilize their benefits (including time off). A leader should set an example by utilizing said benefits themselves.
  • Leadership should address burnout by working quickly to fill positions during periods of staff shortages/turnover and be realistic about the workload a team of their size can reasonably manage.
  • In addition, leadership should have empathy and an open ear for what employees wish to communicate about their well-being to their employers.
  • Finally, office leaders should consider bringing ideas for policy change to the entities that have the power to affect change in this area within their organization. (For example, advocating for mental health days, a hybrid work environment, etc.) To have a productive conversation, leaders should try finding established policies at peer organizations to share in their discussions, and they should be prepared to demonstrate how allowing such flexibility can ultimately lead to more success for their organization. (i.e. higher employee retention, happier employees, etc.)

What can employees do?

Although there are a variety of ways that employers can (and should) create a culture of wellness in the workplace, it is still important to consider what you can do to continue to prioritize your personal well-being as an employee. (Whether your workplace excels in this area or falls short!) This includes:

  • Finding balance to accommodate your schedule with others’ schedules: this can be tricky if you are in a demanding role. One way to address this is to carve out a recurring time of day that you dedicate solely to address your most urgent and essential tasks, time to deal with unexpected things that pop up, and time specifically to connect with colleagues who need your attention for various things. Whether this is done daily or weekly, having time set aside for colleagues who rely on your input will help make it easier to accommodate your schedule with others’ schedules.
  • Setting clear boundaries: communicate your needs with your supervisor and/or colleagues. If you’re taking on too much work, ask for support. If you find yourself starting to work outside of standard work hours more often than before, speak with your supervisor about re-setting realistic expectations regarding your workload. Additionally, consider putting on a standing-away message that indicates a timeframe in which you aim to respond (e.g. within 48 hours, within 2 business days, etc.). This will set expectations with the recipient, and give you some flexibility with the timeframe in which you can reply.
  • Scheduling breaks throughout your day: all too often, staff are sitting for hours on end at their desks. Between demands from an overflowing inbox, meetings, and eating lunch at our desks, it can be easy to sit for hours without realizing it. Schedule in 5-minute breaks on the hour (where feasible) to get up, walk around, and take a breather.

In conclusion, it’s clear that the well-being of employees is something that is still being overlooked in the field of international education, even as this topic has come to the forefront in recent years. Our hope is that this post will contribute to the ongoing conversation at hand of how to best support employees, and that those of you who can do so will feel inspired to make some positive changes in your work environment in order to best care for and support your employees.

Note from the authors: we would like to extend an extra big “thank you” to those who took the time to respond to our survey. Your insights were invaluable to our blog post and to continuing this discussion regarding mental health and well-being in the international education space!

Additional Resources:

About the Authors

Tiffany Komon is currently an International Programs Advisor/Coordinator with International Programs in Engineering at the University of Michigan. As an advisor, Tiffany assists engineering students in all stages of the education abroad process and is passionate about creating study abroad programming that is accessible and equitable. Tiffany earned her B.S. from Georgetown University, where she concentrated on the intersection of language and culture in the East Asian region. Currently pursuing a Master of Arts in Higher Education, Tiffany’s studies focus on international education and the pursuit of diversity, equity, and inclusion in study abroad programs.

Stephanie Ramin is the Assistant Director of Study Abroad and Exchange Programs at St. Mary’s University in San Antonio, TX, overseeing all study abroad and exchange programming, and working with students in all stages of both processes.  Stephanie earned a B.A. in Psychology from Bethel University and an M.A. in International Education Management from the Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey.  Through various personal experiences studying and working abroad over the years, she became passionate about wanting to assist students in their study-away experiences, helping to bridge cultures across borders and foster meaningful interactions among diverse groups of people.

Why Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Are Essential to the Future of International Education

Why Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Are Essential to the Future of International Education

By Andrew Gordon | April 17, 2024 

As we approach the end of the academic year, higher education and by extension the field of international education faces an ever-shifting landscape, especially with respect to diversity, equity, and inclusion work. Our community has been resilient in its commitment and efforts to expand access to global educational opportunities so that all students can benefit from our important work. Despite the headwinds, the Diversity Abroad community has rallied to support inclusive excellence in international education through innovative partnerships, targeted program offerings, and workforce diversification initiatives.

Still, as we navigate these complex times, the need to further position inclusive excellence at the heart of international education is more urgent than ever. Why can we make this statement with such confidence? At a time of unprecedented scrutiny on the value of higher education and its ability to support student success, particularly for students from historically marginalized backgrounds, it is crucial that our field align with the broader goals of higher education that are focused on inclusive student success. We know—many of us firsthand—the transformative power of international education. It enhances academic achievement, fosters personal growth, and prepares students for their future careers. Centering inclusive excellence brings the students at the margins of our work to the center. This centering ensures that our practices and policies don’t unintentionally create barriers to access for our most underserved students and thus exacerbate educational inequities. Instead, centering inclusive excellence positions us to effectively support all students through our work. 

“Now more than ever, as a field and individually, we must be clear about our ‘why’ for diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging. Our why has to be more than ‘it’s the right thing to do’. It is—but it’s much more.”

We make this analysis of the critical need to center inclusive excellence in international education against the backdrop of unprecedented attacks on diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts in higher education. At the time of this writing, 84 bills have been introduced in 28 states which aim to curtail or eliminate diversity, equity, and inclusion work. While good-faith critique can improve the effectiveness of DEI practices—like it does for any body of work—much of the criticism created by anti-DEI activists has been in bad faith and created an environment where the baby is thrown out with the proverbial bath water. Make no mistake, these laws threaten the progress our field has made in both ensuring equitable access to the benefits of international education and in building inclusive workplaces where all employees feel they belong. Stalling inclusive excellence work in international education or relegating it to a hidden or ancillary function will return us to a time when international education was a field that served the few, the privileged. This, in turn, would put international education at odds with the broader higher education field and its stakeholders that are increasingly prioritizing and funding curricular and co-curricular activities that support the success of all students, often with an emphasis on populations that have been historically underserved.  

This said, you may have understandable feelings of trepidation about championing global inclusive excellence in this climate. How, then, can we build upon our past success and continue to advance this critical work in international education given the current landscape? First, it’s important to note that no matter how noble the effort, if we cannot clearly articulate how our fields’ diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives align with broader higher education goals, we should expect greater scrutiny of such efforts. Now more than ever, as a field and individually, we must be clear about our ‘why’ for diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging in international education. Our why has to be more than ‘it’s the right thing to do’. It is—but it’s so much more. Global education is a proven high-impact practice that positively impacts student success. As such we champion global inclusive excellence because we know the impact. We are confident that  embedded practices and policies that ensure equitable access to and inclusive support in global education will position our students to succeed academically and professionally. 

Likewise, research-based inclusive practices that work to eliminate bias in hiring and professional advancement processes will ensure our field can attract and retain qualified professionals that represent the rich diversity of the students whom we support. Such practices support the aspirations of the professionals who call international education home. And, a diverse and talented workforce in international education better positions us to propel the required innovation for our field to meet the evolving needs of students, policymakers, and the broader higher education sector. 

Being clear on our why allows us to defend the essential need for global inclusive excellence work. But, we are not naive. We understand that for many of those whose criticism of diversity, equity, and inclusion work is disingenuous or a pure political calculation, how global inclusive excellence practices positively impact student or employee success will be of little importance. In spite of this, this work is critical to the future of international education and its role in the higher education ecosystem. This is Diversity Abroad’s why. For nearly 20 years Diversity Abroad has been the leading voice in advocating for the importance of implementing inclusive excellence practice and policies into international higher education, both at colleges and universities as well as global learning organizations. We’ve done this—and will continue to—not based on a particular political ideology, but based on the shared belief in the power of international education and our commitment to ensuring every student has equitable access to the academic, interpersonal, and career benefits afforded through global learning opportunities. 

Because of Diversity Abroad’s unwavering commitment to global inclusive excellence, our organization has been uniquely impacted by the current wave of anti-DEI legislation. Still, we’re confident that with the ongoing support of our members and partners, we will continue to do this critical work to ensure our field is a force for eliminating educational inequities by positioning all students to thrive academically, professionally and in their communities.

What’s next? Here is how you can take action.

  • Whether or not your institution or organization is directly impacted by anti-DEI legislation, stay engaged and informed to understand how any changes to diversity, equity, and inclusion work on your campus will impact global inclusive excellence practices and policies.
  • If you haven’t already, gather qualitative and quantitative data that demonstrates how global inclusive excellence practices and policies align with your institution’s student success goals.
  • Share your successes. Whether the focus is on education abroad, international student success, or otherwise, share how global inclusive excellence practices are having an impact on your students, faculty, and staff.
  • Stay engaged with Diversity Abroad. If you’re a current member are there others on your campus that will benefit from your institution’s membership? If you’re not a member, consider joining. Our ecosystem of resources and professional development opportunities are specifically designed to center inclusive excellence within international education. Whether you’re new to this work or are a veteran practitioner, we’re here to support. 

Our Advocacy During 2023/24

Looking back to the 2023/24 academic year, here is how Diversity Abroad supported our members during these challenging times:

Affirmative Action Impact Analysis – Diversity Abroad published an analysis of the impact of the repeal of affirmative action on international education. 

Anti-DEI Impact Analysis – Diversity Abroad published an analysis of the impact of anti-DEI legislation on international education and continues to monitor the impact.  

Focus Groups – To better understand the climate on campus and to provide adequate support, Diversity Abroad has hosted focus groups with senior international officers and chief diversity officers from institutions directly impacted by anti-DEI laws. 

Professional Development – A number of sessions at Global Inclusion 2023 tackled the anti-DEI legislation, including a plenary on The Future of Diversity, Equity & Inclusion in a Post-Affirmative Action Era. Additionally Diversity Abroad has hosted four webinars for its members on these developments. 

Upcoming Engagement & Advocacy 

What can you look forward to in the 2024/25 year? Here are a few concrete resources and opportunities spearheaded by Diversity Abroad to support the advancement of global inclusive excellence in the field of international education:

Advocacy Teach In – During summer 2024 Diversity Abroad will virtually host a two-part training on how to advocate for global inclusive excellence in the current landscape. 

Advocacy Toolkit – During summer 2024 Diversity Abroad will share an advocacy toolkit for its member institutions. The toolkit will support institutions in highlighting the impact of inclusive excellence efforts on international education.

Open Access Student Resources – In May 2024, Diversity Abroad will sunset its student portal, DiversityAbroad.com, and relaunch it under a new brand, BeGlobalii.com. In some geographic locations  institutions are legally limited in the direct inclusive support they can provide to students interested in global experiences. BeGlobalii’s open access resource and opportunities hub can be leveraged to provide targeted identity related support to students and recent graduates interested in global programs. 

Global Inclusion Fund – A matching fund, the Global Inclusion Fund allows Diversity Abroad members to sponsor an institution that is unable to use public funds to access member resources or attend the annual Global Inclusion Conference. 

Closing Thoughts

Even during challenging geopolitical times, our world is increasingly interconnected. The challenges and opportunities that lie ahead are global in nature. The future is global. The need for young people and students to be globally engaged is clear. The field of international education is at the forefront of ensuring all students have equitable access to the global learning opportunities that will position them to thrive in globally diverse communities, campuses, and professional environments. We look forward to our ongoing partnership with our members and partners to solidify global inclusive excellence into the fabric of international education and ensure our work supports greater success—academic, personal, and professional—and deeper global understanding. 

About the Author

Andrew Gordon is an award winning  social entrepreneur. In 2006 he founded Diversity Abroad with a simple vision, that the next generation of young people have equitable access to global educational opportunities that position them to thrive academically, interpersonally, and professionally. Today Diversity Abroad is the leading member consortium advancing inclusive student success through equitable access to international education and global learning opportunities.

Motivations to Study Abroad: Latin American Perspectives on Student Trends

Motivations to Study Abroad: Latin American Perspectives on Student Trends

From Live Session on April 11, 2024

Session Description:

The Diversity Abroad Community of Practice: Latin American and the Caribbean invites you to join experts from the region in a panel. This Community Discussion will center their voices on topics such as shifting demographics, innovative programming and reflecting on current data..

    Moderators:

    • Daniel Watson, ISEP
    • Marnie Nelson, International Educator | Miami University
    • Shayna Trujillo, Learning And Development Specialist | American Institutes for Research

    Panelists:

    • Gabriela Ardito, Founder & CEO | VCE International
    • Hilde Gonzalez Sanchez, Directora de Servicios para Estudiantes y Colaboradores Internacionales | Universidad de Monterrey
    • Ivannia Morales Hidalgo, Institutional Relations & International Liaison, ICDS